Confined to a Castle

Welcome to Celebrate Poe - This is episode 342 - Confined to a Castle

This episode is the fourth episode of Celebrate Poe dealing with Elizabeth Bathory, the Hungarian countess accused of serial murder.  Now it was next to impossible for a person of her statue to be imprisoned, so it was said that she was confined to a Castle in Slovakia in  until her death.

The nature of Báthory's confinement - like the exact nature of her crimes - has been subject to some debate. Initially, it was believed that she was bricked into a room in the castle. However, documents from a visits by local priests in suggest she could move freely within the castle, indicating it was more akin to house arrest.

Thank you for experiencing Celebrate Poe.

Transcript

Welcome to Celebrate Poe - This is episode 342 - Confined in a Castle

Hope you are doing well - this episode is the fourth episode of Celebrate Poe dealing with Elizabeth Bathory, the Hungarian countess accused of serial murder.  Now it was next to impossible for a person of her statue to be imprisoned, so it was said that she was confined to a Castle in Slovakia in  until her death.

The nature of Báthory's confinement - like the exact nature of her crimes - has been subject to some debate. Initially, it was believed that she was bricked into a room in the castle. However, documents from a visits by local priests in suggest she could move freely within the castle, indicating it was more akin to house arrest.

During her confinement:

She was able to write a will in September 6, distributing her estates and possessions among her children.

Her only visitors were priests and Count Thurzó himself.  Now a little bit of background about Count Thurzo - He  was a prominent Hungarian nobleman who had played a crucial role in the Elizabeth Báthory case. He served as the Palatine of Hungary from 1609 to 1616, a position equivalent to a prime minister. In 1610, Emperor Matthias tasked Thurzó with investigating the serious allegations against Countess Elizabeth Báthory, who was accused of torturing and murdering numerous young women.

On December 29, 1610, Thurzó led a raid on Báthory's Castle Čachtice, where he reportedly caught her in the act of tormenting a victim - emphasis on “reportedly.” He immediately imprisoned Báthory in her home due to her high status. Thurzó then arrested four of Báthory's servants, who were subsequently questioned, tortured, and put on trial in early January 1611.
And you can imagine how reliable the information gained from that torture was - just sayin’

Thurzó's investigation gathered substantial evidence against Báthory, including 289 witness statements. However, as mentioned in a previous episode, Báthory herself was never formally tried, likely due to her aristocratic status and potential political repercussions. Instead, she was placed under what you might call house arrest in Castle Čachtice, where she remained for the rest of her life.

The clerics reported that she remained unrepentant and enraged, insisting that her assistants were the real criminals.

On August , 6, Báthory complained to her bodyguard about having cold hands. The guard advised her to lie down, and she was found dead the following morning.

After her death:

She was initially buried in the church of Csejte on November , 6.

Some sources suggest her body was later moved to the town of her birthplace due to villagers' protests about her being buried in their cemetery.

It's important to note that Báthory was never formally charged or given a proper trial, likely due to her high status and political considerations. Her confinement was a compromise that allowed authorities to stop her alleged crimes while avoiding the scandal of a public trial for a noblewoman.

Based on the available information, there were few notable events or incidents during Elizabeth Báthory's confinement at Castle Čachtice from late 6 or early 6 until her death in 6. However, a few points can be highlighted:

Political context: The complex political situation, including religious conflicts and the extension of Habsburg power, may have influenced Báthory's case. However, there's no indication that these factors led to attempts to free her.

Four of Báthory's servants (three females and one male) were arrested along with her in late December 6.

These servants were subjected to questioning and torture.

Their court proceedings began in early January 6, and the trial lasted only one day.

Two female servants were sentenced to have their fingers torn away with hot pincers before being thrown alive into a fire.

A male servant, was sentenced to decapitation due to his youth, and his body was then thrown into the fire - ah - the privileges of youth.

A fourth defendant was reportedly acquitted and vanished from the record.

Another servant initially escaped but was later captured and burned alive.

The swift nature of the arrests, trials, and executions, combined with the severe punishments, suggests that there were no significant attempts to rescue these servants. The focus of the authorities appears to have been on quickly punishing those deemed complicit in Báthory's alleged crimes rather than considering their potential innocence or coercion.

One very interesting facet to all this was the local community and how they reacted to the executions of the servants.

Most common people were likely unaware of or indifferent to the executions, as they were primarily concerned with their daily lives.
In the early 7th century, executions were more commonplace, and people generally accepted the decisions of those in power without much questioning. Official narratives often swayed public opinion, potentially portraying the servants as guilty and deserving of their fate.

There may have been differing reactions based on social status, with the elite possibly having more information or stronger opinions about the case.

And given the political climate of the time, people might have been hesitant to express dissent or sympathy for the executed, fearing repercussions.
It's important to note that public reactions to executions varied depending on the social status of the condemned and the nature of their alleged crimes.

The executions of Elizabeth Báthory's servants likely had minimal impact on the overall social hierarchy in the community, but they did reinforce certain aspects of the existing social order:

You see, public executions were common in early 7th-century Europe and were seen as a way to demonstrate the power of the state and the consequences of transgressing the law.

The swift and harsh punishment of the servants, compared to the house arrest of Báthory herself, highlighted the stark differences in how the nobility and commoners were treated by the justice system.

The executions served as a reminder of the rigid social structure, where servants had little opportunity for advancement and could face severe consequences for their actions.

Remember that during this period, people generally accepted the decisions of those in power without much questioning, reinforcing the existing social order.

While these executions may have momentarily disrupted the local community, they ultimately served to reinforce the existing social structure rather than significantly altering it.

Now, the villagers likely harbored deep resentment and fear toward Báthory. Many of her alleged victims were local peasant girls, and the sheer number of disappearances would have caused widespread unease. Even after her imprisonment, the common people reportedly protested against her burial in their local church, forcing her body to be relocated elsewhere.

The common people likely fueled the spread of gruesome legends about her crimes, including the infamous (but unsubstantiated) claim that she bathed in the blood of virgins. These stories may have been exaggerated over time, blending real fears with folklore.

The nobility's silence about Báthory after her arrest is telling. Aristocrats often gossiped about scandals, but there are no surviving letters discussing her case. This absence suggests either fear of political repercussions or a deliberate effort to erase her from memory.

Some historians argue that Báthory was a victim of a politically motivated plot. Her vast wealth and support for her nephew, Prince Gábor Báthory of Transylvania, made her a target for powerful enemies like the Habsburgs, who stood to benefit from her downfall.

Over time, Elizabeth Báthory's story evolved from historical crime to mythic horror. The blood-bathing legend only appeared a century after her death, likely as part of efforts to vilify her further. This transformation reflects how societal fears—of powerful women or unchecked cruelty—can shape historical memory.

In Slovakia and Hungary, Báthory's tale remains deeply embedded in local folklore. Her name is synonymous with evil, and the ruins of her castle attracts visitors intrigued by its dark history.

At first, the villagers who lived near her castle harbored deep fear and resentment toward Báthory, as many of her alleged victims were local peasant girls. After her death, the common people reportedly protested against her burial in their local church, forcing her body to be relocated.

The local community likely fueled the spread of gruesome legends about her crimes, including unsubstantiated claims that exaggerated her atrocities

Over time, Báthory's story evolved from a historical crime to mythic horror, becoming deeply embedded in local folklore. Her name became synonymous with evil in Slovakia and Hungary.

Interestingly, the current attitude of the local community has shifted. In a more recent account, the Mayor of the local town expressed a positive view of Báthory's legacy. When asked about potential resentments or hate, she laughed and said that Báthory "is ours now," acknowledging the economic benefits the town receives from tourism related to the Countess's infamy.

This change in attitude over the centuries demonstrates how historical events can be reinterpreted and even embraced by local communities, especially when they bring economic advantages.

The aristocracy remained largely silent about Bathory's case after her arrest. This absence of gossip or discussion in surviving letters suggests either fear of political repercussions or a deliberate effort to erase her from memory.

In recent years, there has been a shift in local attitudes. The older generation in the area seems ashamed of Bathory's legacy, with some protests occurring when her statue was erected in the town square. In contrast, younger generations view her historical significance differently, with some even using the castle ruins for recreational activities - interesting place for a party.

It's important to note that in early 7th century Hungary, public protests against nobility were uncommon, and the power dynamics of the time likely prevented any significant public reaction to Bathory's arrest.

The case highlighted the existing legal framework that allowed aristocrats to avoid public trials. Báthory was put under house arrest instead of facing a public trial due to her high social status - in other words, artisticratic privilege.

The incident did not appear to fundamentally alter the power dynamics between the nobility and peasants.  The wealthy landowners, including Báthory's family, continued to rule with cruelty to maintain the status quo.

The trial of Báthory's accomplices followed standard Early Modern judicial procedures, including the use of torture to obtain confessions. This suggests that the legal system remained largely unchanged in its approach to criminal cases.

The case also demonstrated how existing laws could be manipulated for political gain, as seen in the use of a legal loophole to arrest Báthory without a trial.

The incident did not seem to change the legal status of servants significantly. It remained within an aristocrat's rights to discipline servants harshly, even to the point of death.

While Báthory's case was certainly notorious, it does not appear to have prompted immediate, significant changes in local laws or policies. The existing power structures and legal frameworks seem to have remained largely intact in the immediate aftermath of her arrest.

It is interesting to note that imediately following her arrest, there was a notable silence among the nobility, suggesting either fear of political repercussions or a deliberate effort to erase her from memory.

Despite the aristocratic silence, Báthory's story continued to exist in the stories and legends of the common people in the area for nearly a century.

Remember that he infamous legend of Báthory bathing in the blood of virgins to retain her youth only appeared about a century after her death, and It did not take long for Báthory to be reimagined in folklore as a vampire-like character, with stories of her biting victims until they bled, drawing parallels to Dracula.

The legend evolved to emphasize themes of vanity, cruelty, and noble power abuse, reflecting societal fears of unchecked aristocratic power.

In recent years, Elizabeth Báthory has become a popular figure in horror literature, true crime accounts, and various media adaptations, cementing her status as a cultural icon of evil.

This evolution demonstrates how historical events can be shaped by societal fears, political climates, and cultural needs over time, transforming a controversial historical figure into a legendary monster.

Elizabeth Báthory's legend stands out among famous female villains in folklore due to several unique aspects:

Historical basis: Unlike many folkloric villains, Báthory was a real historical figure. This lends her legend a sense of authenticity and horror that purely fictional characters lack.

Motivation: While many female villains in folklore are driven by jealousy or revenge, Báthory's alleged crimes were attributed to vanity and a desire for eternal youth. This unique motivation set her apart from other villainous women in folklore.

Aristocratic status: Báthory's noble background added an element of power abuse to her story, distinguishing her from common witches or evil stepmothers often found in folklore.

Transformation into vampire-like figure: Eventually, Báthory was reimagined as a vampire-like character, drawing parallels to Dracula. This transformation elevated her to a more supernatural status compared to other historical villains.

Cultural icon: Báthory has become a popular figure in horror literature, true crime accounts, and various media adaptations. Her enduring presence in popular culture surpasses many other female villains from folklore.

Complexity of interpretation: Unlike many one-dimensional villains, Báthory's story has been reinterpreted over time. In some narratives, she's portrayed as a victim of political conspiracy or gender-based persecution, adding layers of complexity to her character.

Blend of history and fantasy: Báthory's legend uniquely blends historical fact with fantastical elements, creating a narrative that's both grounded in reality and wildly imaginative.

In comparison to other famous female villains in folklore, Báthory's legend is more deeply rooted in historical reality, has evolved more dramatically over time, and has maintained a stronger presence in modern popular culture. Her story combines elements of true crime, supernatural horror, and historical mystery in a way that few other folkloric villains can match.

Join Celebrate Poe for 

Sources include: Infamous Lady: The True Story of Countess Bathory by Kimberley Craft, Countess Elizabeth Bathory: The Life and Legacy of History’s Most Prolific Killer, The Countess by Rebecca Johns, and The Nightingale's Castle: A Novel of Erzsébet Báthory, the Blood Countess
by Sonia Velton.  

Thank you for listening to Celebrate Poe.